WILD4LIFE

WILD FOR LIFE






born to be wild



​ Not to bE pets








​



                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
  • Home
  • About Us
  • About
  • About
  • Case for Pets
  • Against Pets
  • Sugar Gliders
  • In their own words
  • Please Help

WE ALL LOVE AUSTRALIA'S UNIQUE WILDLIFE

Most of us want to see our native animals in the bush enjoying a 'wild life'.  So why does the NSW Government allow a handful of people to keep native animals in enclosures in urban homes, surrounded by dogs and cats?
The NSW Government is considering expanding the list of native animals that can be kept as pets. In 2018 the NSW government indicated it would consider allowing mammals to be added to that list  - a move opposed by every established animal welfare and conservation organisation in New South Wales, and which is at odds with advice from the NSW National Parks & Wildlife Service (see here).  
CLICK HERE TO SEE THE 30-SECOND "I AM NOT YOUR PET" VIDEO
Picture

NOT PETS!

Studies show that some species may have a gene that pre-disposes them to domestication - a process that takes thousands of years. Just keeping native species and hoping they will truly domesticate is not only  cruel, it is unscientific.
Picture

FREEDOM

Whether or not people could make native mammals into  "good" pets - the question is should we?   Do we really want to rob them of their freedom to climb, glide, fly or bound across the Australian landscape - and lock them away in cages?
Picture

ESCAPES!

When native 'pets' escape, most will suffer and die from malnutrition, dehydration or predators. Those that live can introduce diseases to the wild, interbreed or otherwise harm local wildlife. This is true of birds, reptiles and mammals.
Some will say keeping native mammals as pets is good for the environment - but it isn't 
They will tell you the animals won't suffer - but they will
They will say they can be released back into the wild - but they can't
A QUESTION OF BALANCE
​-
See our pages for and against native mammal keeping:
There are no benefits,
​only risks 
The welfare of wildlife must take precedence over the profit and amusement of hobbyists, who despite their claims, have done nothing to contribute to wildlilfe conservation
Disease
Picture
Native animals are susceptible to a range of ailments & diseases beyond those we know with traditional pets, making them more expensive and more likely to suffer and die. Some may carry novel diseases that can infect humans.
Welfare
Picture
Some people claim there are no welfare issues - but every animal welfare organisation in NSW without exception says these animals will be subject to neglect, abandonment and mistreatment
Image: suzsugargliders.com
Home Range
Picture
Many native mammals and bird species  have huge natural ranges - some hundreds of kilometres. This is their natural state.  Some people want to confine these animals to live in urban houses and backyards. 
There is no conservation benefit to allowing more native animals to be kept as pets.
But some people prefer willidfe in captivity rather than living a natural wild life.
And some profit from the expoitation of wildlife as pets,
​oblivious to the cruelty and misery this causes.

Home

  About

Case For Pets

Case Against

Please Help

Sugar Gliders

Expert Opinion

Contact

Copyright © 2018
  • Home
  • About Us
  • About
  • About
  • Case for Pets
  • Against Pets
  • Sugar Gliders
  • In their own words
  • Please Help